Kathryn W. Davis Projects for Peace
2018 PROPOSAL TIMELINE
Fellowships for the Public Good Lunch
October 10th (3rd Wednesday, Block 2) at 12:15 pm in McHugh Commons
Come find out more information about the Projects for Peace and the proposal process, as well as other fellowships to support meaningful work! To find out more and RSVP, click here.
Practice Pitch Session
Nov. 8th (3rd Thursday, Block 3) from 3-5, Spencer Board Room)
Putting together an application for the Davis Projects for Peace? Come practice your pitch, receive feedback from the committee, and refine your thoughts before the final round! Email firstname.lastname@example.org to be added to the schedule.
Final Pitch Session, Proposals Due
Dec. 12th (3rd Wednesday, Block 4) from 3-5, Spencer Board Room).
At this session, students will "pitch" their final proposals for the Davis Projects for Peace to selection committee members. Come share your proposals, support your peers, or learn from the process to refine your ideas to apply in future years! Proposals must submitted by 3:00 (click here to submit a proposal). Email email@example.com to be added to the Pitch schedule.
If you have questions, contact:
Collaborative for Community Engagement
Dr. Jordan Travis Radke, Director
The following information is taken from the Davis Projects for Peace website:
Davis Projects for Peace is an initiative for all students at the Davis United World College Scholars Program partner schools to design grassroots projects for the summer of 2019 - anywhere in the world - which promote peace and address the root causes of conflict among parties. We encourage applicants to use their creativity to design projects and employ innovative techniques for engaging project participants in ways that focus on conflict resolution, reconciliation, building understanding and breaking down barriers which cause conflict, and finding solutions for resolving conflict and maintaining peace. Through a competition on over 90 campuses, projects will be selected for funding at $10,000 each.
We hope to encourage student initiative, innovation and entrepreneurship focusing on conflict prevention, resolution or reconciliation. Some of the most compelling projects to date have reflected one or more of the following characteristics: contributing to conflict prevention; ameliorating conditions leading to violence/conflict; looking for and building on shared attributes among differing peoples, races, ethnicities, tribes, clans, etc.; fostering diplomacy or otherwise contribute to advancing peace processes underway; promoting economic opportunity and entrepreneurship among those in post-conflict areas; finding creative ways to bring people on opposite sides of issues together, such as through art, sports, music or other techniques to promote a common humanity; developing leadership and mediation skills training for those in conflict or post-conflict societies; starting or leveraging initiatives, organizations (e.g. education, health) or infrastructure projects to build/rebuild community.
Each year, Colorado College is invited to submit one proposal to the Davis Foundation for consideration, as well as an alternate proposal.
To be considered, a student (or group of students) must prepare a written statement which describes the project (who, what, where, how) including expected outcomes and prospects for future impact (not to exceed two pages) as well as a budget (one separate page). All written project proposals require a heading to include the following: name of the participating institution, name of all student participants, title of project, country where the project will be take place. Proposals should include pre-approval of all parties and organizations involved in the project. The two-page proposal and one-page budget should be submitted electronically via Summit.
Please refer to the website for more details: http://www.davisprojectsforpeace.org
The selection committee will evaluate proposed projects according to the following dimensions:
Following the recommendations of the Davis Foundation, proposals will be assessed according to five key dimensions: preparation, implementation, outcomes, sustainability and feasibility. Below, applicants can find the types of questions that the committee will use to evaluate the strength of proposals within these dimensions.
Preparation – To what extent do students’ knowledge, relationships, skills, and personal narratives prepare them for the project?
- To what extent do students have place-based, local, contextualized knowledge? Or, to what extent can students draw on relationships with individuals or organizations with such knowledge?
- To what extent was the project co-designed with community members/organizations in order to leverage local expertise, and under the guidance of academic mentors?
- To what extent do students have the capacities needed to implement the project?
- To what extent do students’ personal backgrounds and identities prepare them for the project?
Implementation – To what extent does the project follow best practices of community-engaged work?
- To what extent does the project…
- address community-driven needs, those identified by the people most impacted by the issue?
- engage local citizens and organizations as collaborators in the design and implementation of the project?
- provide opportunity for community-building among diverse stakeholders?
- To what extent is the project …
- asset-based, building on existing ideas, initiatives, organizations, relationships, or structures within communities?
- place-based, in which the location of the project is justified by the need (rather than vice versa)?
- To what extent is the plan thorough and comprehensive, detailed and practical?
- To what extent does the project acknowledge the complexity and nuance of the social world? Can the plan adjust to unforeseen circumstances and challenges, and are the applicants adaptable?
Outcomes – To what degree can the project meaningfully influence communities and student participants?
- To what extent can the project “promote peace and address the root causes of conflict among parties”?
- To what extent does the project provide opportunity for student development and growth, building students’ capacities as engaged citizens?
Sustainability – To what extent can the project lay the groundwork for more long-term, sustainable work?
- To what extent do applicants propose a thoughtful, realistic plan to transition the project into a sustainable initiative (if assessment of the project supports this need)?
- To what extent does the project enable the local community to continue the work?
- To what degree will the project’s impact be lasting?
Feasibility – To what degree can applicants do what they propose to do?
- To what extent are the goals of the project obtainable?
- To what extent is the project design, timeline, and budget realistic?
- To what extent is the project safe? Does the project minimize risk for all stakeholders?
|Date||Name of Project||Recipient(s)||Location||Proposal||Report|
Los Pocitos Outdoor Community Center
|Mitra Ghaffari, Evyn Papworth||Cuba||
y - blog
Chaupimonte Community Mill: Supporting Education Through Coffee Development in Oxapampa
|Lucy Marshall, Eva Mckinsey||Peru||x||x|
A Generation for Peace: Creating Opportunities for Nepali-Tibetan Youth Engagement
|James Daudon, Anna Kelly and Lauren Schmidt||Nepal||x
BINAT: Bethlehem Inter-Camp Athletics
|Baheya Malaty, Mary Jones||Palestine|
The "Shaanti" Project
|Tashbid Shafat Sattar||Bangladesh||x||x|
Building Peace through Building People
Viajana Amkeni Sasa Initiative: Creating a Peaceful Society in Kenya
|Benjamin Munyao, Collins Mukaria, Eddy Oketch||Kenya||x||x|
|2011||The Zuia! Initiative||Akie Mochizuki, Nikhil Ranadive, Melissa Serafin||Kenya||x||x|
|2010||Ain’t No Stoppin’ Da Bus: Travelling Art Workshops for Peace||Shire Brown, Eddie Hazera, Jody Joyner||USA||x||x|
|2009||The Prozor Project||Joseph Hauck, Max Stein, Antonio Skarica, Melissa Serafin||Bosnia||x||x|
|2008||Solar Water Disinfection||Valerie Grosscup, Jonathan Spear||Ecuador||x||x|
|2008||Cover One in Honduras: Promoting Athletics and Healthcare||Ericka Baer, Alina Ford, Max Green, Misael Fernandez, Jocelyn Corbett, Jason Steiert, Billy Blaustein||Honduras||x||x|
|2007||Unheard Voices for Peace||Michael Shum||Nigeria||x||x|
Excellent (but unfunded) Proposals
|Date||Name of Project||Proposer(s)||Location||Proposal|
|2017||The Play to Love, Play to Learn Project||Annika Kastetter, Mayss Al Alami||Jordan||x|
|2016||Sewing the Seeds of Peace||Mostafa Hatem Mostafa Zaki- Taha||Egypt||x|
Wadi Climbing: Rock Climb Palestine
|Tim Brunes, Will Harris||Palestine||x|
|2013||The Tabellah Project: Soccer, Education, and Peace||James Earl Kiawoin||Liberia||x|
|2012||Adventures in Interfaith Understanding||Lindsey Pointer, Sam Seiniger||Colorado||x|
|2011||Out of the Cloud: Promoting Peace and Sustainability in Peru through Interactive Education||Bernadette Stocker, Utsarga Bhattarai||Peru||Unavailable|
|2010||Empowerment Through Edible Forestry||Athena Mikros, Riley Hawkins||Uganda||x|
|2009||Converting Livestock Manure into a Fuel Source for Thai Ethnic Tribes||Liza Mitchell, Phillip Sasser, Julianne Kellogg||Thailand||x|
|2009||Movement Towards Peace for the People of Tonga||Rosey Puloka, Amy Rubin, Emily Houston, Madison Moross, Caroline Janeway||Tonga||x|
|2008||Storytelling: Striving for Peace Through Shared Experience||Elizabeth Gessinger, Rachel Johnson, Jacob Reuter||South Africa||x|