References

Association for Women in Science (AWIS).  1995.  A Hand Up:  Women Mentoring Women in Science.  Washington, DC:  AWIS

Camilla P. Benbow and Julian C. Stanley.  1980.  “Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability:  Fact or Artifact?”  Science 210:  1262 – 1264.

Bruce L. Berg.  1995.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 2nd edition.  Boston, MA.  Allyn and Bacon.

College Blue Book, Volume 1 (30th Ed.). (2003). Farmington Hills, MI: MacMillan Reference.

Committee on the Status of Women in Physics Site Visit Program.  Web page.  http://www.aps.org/educ/cswp/sitevist.shtml

Margaret Eisenhart and Elizabeth Finkel.  1998.  Women’s Science:  Learning and Succeeding from the Margins.  Chicago, IL:  University of Chicago Press.

Anne Fausto-Sterling.  1992.  Myths of Gender:  Biological Theories about Men and Women, revised edition.  New York, NY:  Basic Books.

Mary Fehrs and Roman Czujko, “Women in Physics, Reversing the Exclusion,”  Physics Today, August 1992, pp. 33 – 40. 

Judy R. Franz, “Improving the Climate for Women in Physics.”  Final report of the NSF-funded project.  Available on the Web at http://www.aps.org/educ/cswp/site-summary.shtml

Melvin D. George, Sadie Bragg, Alfredo G. de los Santos, Jr., Denice D. Denton, Peter Gerber, Mary M. Lindquist, James M. Rosser, David A. Sanchez, and Carolyn Meyers.  1996.  “Shaping the Future:  New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology.”  National Science Foundation Report # 96-139.

Rachel Ivie, American Institute of Physics Education and Employment Statistics Division.  July 2000.  Private communication.

Rachel Ivie and Katie Stowe.  June 2000.  Women in Physics, 2000, AIP Publication Number R-430.  (Available from AIP or on the Web at http://www.aip.org/satistics/trends/highlite/women/women.htm

Evelyn Fox Keller. 1977.  "The Anomaly of a Woman in Physics,"  in Sara Ruddick and Pamela Daniels, eds.  Working It Out, 77 - 91.  NewYork:  Pantheon Books.

Vera Kistiakowski.  1980.   "Women in Physics:  Unnecessary, Injurious, and Out of Place?"  Physics Today 33 (February):  32 - 40.

Project Kaliedoscope (PKAL).  1991.  What Works:  Building Natural Science Communities.  Washington, DC:  PKAL.

Priscilla Laws, Pamela Rosborough, Frances Poodry.  1999.  “Women’s Responses to an Activity-Based Introductory Physics Program.”  American Journal of Physics.  Supplement 1 to Volume 67, number 7 (July).  S32 – S37.

John Lofland and Lyn H. Lofland.  1995.  Analyzing Social Settings:  A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis.  Belmont, CA.  Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Patrick Mulvey, American Institute of Physics Education and Employment Statistics Division.  2000  Private communication.

John S. Rigden, Donald F. Holcomb, and Rosanne di Stefano.  1993.  "The Introductory University Physics Project."  Physics Today 46 (April):  32 - 37.

Sue V. Rosser.  1991.  Female Friendly Science:  Applying Women’s Studies Methods and Theories to Attract Students.  New York, NY:  Teacher’s College Press.

Aimee Sands.  1993.  "Never Meant to Survive:  A Black Woman's Journey -- an Interview with Evelynn Hammonds."  In Sandra Harding, ed.  The Racial Economy of Science:  Towards a Democratic Future, 239 - 48.  Bloomington, IN:  Indiana University Press.

Elaine Seymour and Nancy M. Hewitt.  1997.  Talking about Leaving:  Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences.  Boulder, CO:  Westview Press.

William B. Shaffir, Robert A. Stebbins, and Allan Turowetz.  1980.  Field Work Experience:  Qualitative Approaches to Social Research.  New York, NY.  St. Martin’s Press

Gerhard Sonnert and Gerald Holton.  1995.  Who Succeeds in Science?  The Gender Dimension.  New Brunswick, NJ:  Rutgers University Press.

Barbara L. Whitten.  2000.  “Improving the Climate for Women in Physics Site Visit Program.”  CSWP Gazette 19:2 (Fall 2000).  3, 9.

Barbara L. Whitten and Juan R. Burciaga.  2000.  “Feminist and Multicultural Pedagogy in Physics:  A Status Report.”  Women’s Studies Quarterly 28 (Spring/Summer 2000):  213 – 235.