[Katie]
Today we almost finished Cougar Cub. We recorded the midden and the
sample taken from it, and the extent of the site. There are a lot
of drainages at the site. There is a bigger one that flows right through
the kiva (backfilled in '83). It is kinda cool cause there are at
least 4 hand/toe holds pecked in to the rock face. There are also
some petroglyphs pecked into the rock that we didn't see at first
between the E and W portions of the site. They are both snake-like
shapes and one is man-like and the other has 4 pecked circles next
to it. Tucker also found some corn cobs under one of the boulders
and some mano and metate frags.
[Chelsea]
While mapping rooms 4 and 5, Katie and I observed that room 4 apperaed
to have a wall running N/S that abutted the E/W wall of the room.
Upon further inspection we noticed that the E/W wall (southernmost
wall of Room 4) had a flat tabular slab in it with a possible doorway
that had been filled in.
This wall extension leads us to believe
that a room abutted Room 4 to the south, which we are no designating
as Room 13. This wall extension coming out of the south wall of
room 4 appears to be parallel with the westernmost extension beyond
the southern wall of room 4. The presence of possible viga holes
within Room 4 and 5 in addition to the wall extensions running south
of Room 4's southern wall suggests to us that Room 4 may have abutted
a two story structure (or more specifically abutted Room 2) and
that Room 5 may have abutted a two story structure east of these
rooms as well (possibly abutted Room 3)
The masonry of these rooms consists
of nicely pecked sandstoine slabs with some mortar, chinking, and
some shaping to the slabs. This masonry is distinctly different
from the large cobbles utilized for the western wall of Room 6,
suggesting that different people were constructing their architecture
on this site and the prevalence of wall abutments in the general
layout of the roomblocks in the alcove also suggest that the cliff
dwellings were not constructed along a general plan and instead
constructed at different times. These architectural features coincide
with many of the cliff dwellings at Mesa Verde, including Cliff
Palace and Spruce Tree House, which have a variety of masonry styles
and wall abutments. However, these two sites, while Cougar Cub alcove
is a smaller site than Cliff Palace and Spruce Tree House, one would
expect that with the thirteen observed rooms we would observed multiple
kivas as at these Mesa Verde sites. Does the presence of only one
kiva indicate that the number of families living at Cougar Cub was
limited and that the presence of over a dozen rooms is more indicative
of storage spaces? This certainly seems like a possibility when
we consider Rooms 11 and 7. Room 11 is situated atop a high cliff
edge without easy access and limited floor space, indicating it
may have been for storage. Additionally, Room 7 appears to be less
than one story in heght and the doorway appears to be substantially
smaller than the other doorways associated with rooms within the
alcove. Could someone have been using this doorway simply to reach
into the structure and take goods in and out of it?
[Becky]
After a quick lunch, Kellam and Trevor went and recorded the dam
above the pour-off while I drew our only projectile point. Then
Kellam helped map the two alcove rooms on the western edge of the
site. Then, we were done!!!! It was only about 1ish, so we headed
over to 5MT 1692.
We got there at about the exact same
time as Tucker and Ruth who had come to start on the site while
Katie, Chelsea, and Seth worked on finishing Cougar Cub [5MT 1690].
The five of us started on 1692 w/ Trevor drawing the rock art and
the rest of us flagging. The site was covered with looter holes
and there was no definable midden-artifacts just continued down
slope.
[Trevor]
At 1692 I saw a bunch more rock art on the panel I had already seen
handprints on. I saw another bird and some sort of hatched lines.
These were all pictographs (monochrome)
This rock art will
be good for my paper because it is paintings, which I haven't seen
yet.
It has me wondering why people right
next to the rock art walls at 1693 were painting pictographs and
not making petroglyphs. Was it simply later inhabitants, or perhaps
earlier, who only liked painting? But I thought that these pictographs
were older than some incisions at 1693, this is a big problem in
chronology. I also wonder whether a painting meant something different,
or perhaps it wasn't supposed to be permanent, but why handprints?
Is it like a signature of who lived there or just their way of passing
the time? I don't think it was purely recreational, but I don't
know, nor will anyone ever for the most part, what its true function
was.
back to Journal
|